A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated countrywide focus next an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining created by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the action being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in order to maintain their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal organizing disputes, where by views of the sea are both equally extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic attempts because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the location, according to sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Moments. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Times, a picture which includes because grow to be emblematic in the intensity from the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof with the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing link to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply seeking to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been performed according to Specialist information and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Actual physical truth from the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as built complies Paul Feely with planning permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling disorders. Nonetheless the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay along with each other extensive following the legal expenses are compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken off, or done as planned will rely on the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.